Comments on: Mock Objects for C++, Part 5 http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2008/11/mock-objects-for-c-part-5/ Not quite a Yegge long. Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:39:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 By: Peter Bindels http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2008/11/mock-objects-for-c-part-5/comment-page-1/#comment-236 Peter Bindels Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:10:31 +0000 http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2008/11/mock-objects-for-c-part-5/#comment-236 As I've just reacted to your previous comment, there's a much nicer way of doing this. Given a number of specializations of a template method, you can take the address of that method instantiated with the given argument types, let it put them in a tuple of sorts and send that along to your mocking base logic. If you also add a constant for each function (__LINE__ was my first guess - added a bug to MS Connect for it too as Microsoft considers it not constant) you can instantiate the template for each function separately and keep them separated (so your match matching will work properly too). That way it also works with stdcall functions, as well as thiscall and fastcall functions. As I’ve just reacted to your previous comment, there’s a much nicer way of doing this. Given a number of specializations of a template method, you can take the address of that method instantiated with the given argument types, let it put them in a tuple of sorts and send that along to your mocking base logic. If you also add a constant for each function (__LINE__ was my first guess – added a bug to MS Connect for it too as Microsoft considers it not constant) you can instantiate the template for each function separately and keep them separated (so your match matching will work properly too). That way it also works with stdcall functions, as well as thiscall and fastcall functions.

]]> By: Thiago http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2008/11/mock-objects-for-c-part-5/comment-page-1/#comment-234 Thiago Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:10:12 +0000 http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2008/11/mock-objects-for-c-part-5/#comment-234 There is another interesting framework, maybe useful in future parts: MockItNow - http://www.rorydriscoll.com/mockitnow/ It has a different approach from AMOP and keep things simple. There is another interesting framework, maybe useful in future parts:
MockItNow – http://www.rorydriscoll.com/mockitnow/

It has a different approach from AMOP and keep things simple.

]]>