<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Chris on Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris</link>
	<description>Not quite a Yegge long.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Visual Studio 2010 – 10 is the new 6, but not the way they wanted by admin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2009/07/visual-studio-2010-10-is-the-new-6-but-not-the-way-they-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-949</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2009/07/visual-studio-2010-10-is-the-new-6-but-not-the-way-they-wanted/#comment-949</guid>
		<description>Sure, it&#039;s pretty good in RTM - except that it doesnt work *at all* for C++/CLI, which is a fairly large oversight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, it&#8217;s pretty good in RTM &#8211; except that it doesnt work *at all* for C++/CLI, which is a fairly large oversight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Visual Studio 2010 – 10 is the new 6, but not the way they wanted by Bob Dobbs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2009/07/visual-studio-2010-10-is-the-new-6-but-not-the-way-they-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-948</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2009/07/visual-studio-2010-10-is-the-new-6-but-not-the-way-they-wanted/#comment-948</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re wrong. The new intellisense is god.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re wrong. The new intellisense is god.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Visual Studio 2010 – 10 is the new 6, but not the way they wanted by Dave</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2009/07/visual-studio-2010-10-is-the-new-6-but-not-the-way-they-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 22:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2009/07/visual-studio-2010-10-is-the-new-6-but-not-the-way-they-wanted/#comment-940</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m totally agreeing with this article, its not like the @fail guy says &quot;just an angry person where&quot;

vs2010 is final now and I&#039;ve been using it for a few projects.  I do new projects in the good old fast vs2008... 

vs2010 has potential but if they&#039;re not releasing a sp1 soon its just doomed to fail.

Eclipse all of a sudden looks nice in comparison indeed!

on a side note, on the microsoft forums there are tons of topics about this and it looks like microsoft is nicely ignoring the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m totally agreeing with this article, its not like the @fail guy says &#8220;just an angry person where&#8221;</p>
<p>vs2010 is final now and I&#8217;ve been using it for a few projects.  I do new projects in the good old fast vs2008&#8230; </p>
<p>vs2010 has potential but if they&#8217;re not releasing a sp1 soon its just doomed to fail.</p>
<p>Eclipse all of a sudden looks nice in comparison indeed!</p>
<p>on a side note, on the microsoft forums there are tons of topics about this and it looks like microsoft is nicely ignoring the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on C# 4.0 Features &#8211; Named &amp; Optional Parameters &#8211; Uh, no thanks. by medical assistant</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2010/05/c-4-0-features-named-optional-parameters-uh-no-thanks/comment-page-1/#comment-939</link>
		<dc:creator>medical assistant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2010/05/c-4-0-features-named-optional-parameters-uh-no-thanks/#comment-939</guid>
		<description>nice post. thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice post. thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on C# 4.0 Features &#8211; Named &amp; Optional Parameters &#8211; Uh, no thanks. by emt training</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2010/05/c-4-0-features-named-optional-parameters-uh-no-thanks/comment-page-1/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>emt training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 05:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2010/05/c-4-0-features-named-optional-parameters-uh-no-thanks/#comment-937</guid>
		<description>this post is very usefull thx!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this post is very usefull thx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Language Suckiness Shootout by Paolo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2008/12/language-suckiness-shootout/comment-page-1/#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>Paolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2008/12/language-suckiness-shootout/#comment-933</guid>
		<description>An update about ruby:

google &quot;ruby rocks&quot; About 127,000 results

google &quot;ruby sucks&quot; About 23,600 results

Things changed a lot in these 1.5 years :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An update about ruby:</p>
<p>google &#8220;ruby rocks&#8221; About 127,000 results</p>
<p>google &#8220;ruby sucks&#8221; About 23,600 results</p>
<p>Things changed a lot in these 1.5 years <img src='http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OpenRA Code From Orbit by admin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2010/05/openra-code-from-orbit/comment-page-1/#comment-920</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 23:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2010/05/openra-code-from-orbit/#comment-920</guid>
		<description>The source is available here: http://gist.github.com/233283</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The source is available here: <a href="http://gist.github.com/233283" rel="nofollow">http://gist.github.com/233283</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OpenRA Code From Orbit by Chris</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2010/05/openra-code-from-orbit/comment-page-1/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 18:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2010/05/openra-code-from-orbit/#comment-919</guid>
		<description>I like how easy the repetitive bits are to spot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how easy the repetitive bits are to spot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Call of Duty 4 on GeForce 5&#215;00 Hardware by Call of Duty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2008/10/call-of-duty-4-on-geforce-5x00-hardware/comment-page-1/#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator>Call of Duty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 13:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2008/10/call-of-duty-4-on-geforce-5x00-hardware/#comment-918</guid>
		<description>Hey Buddy, that is actually some positive material!  I have got a complete question for you - just how long did it take you to construct this valuable article?  Regardless, I&#039;m just a genuinely big enthusiast of Modern Warfare 2 and I enjoyed your current post a considerable amount!  Have you actually observed of this specific place known as MW2CC? I believe that you really should make a post regarding it merely because you would have a few cool things to assert :)Many thanks yet again regarding the post and why not consider what precisely I claimed with regards to Modern Warfare 2 Central Command!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Buddy, that is actually some positive material!  I have got a complete question for you &#8211; just how long did it take you to construct this valuable article?  Regardless, I&#8217;m just a genuinely big enthusiast of Modern Warfare 2 and I enjoyed your current post a considerable amount!  Have you actually observed of this specific place known as MW2CC? I believe that you really should make a post regarding it merely because you would have a few cool things to assert <img src='http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Many thanks yet again regarding the post and why not consider what precisely I claimed with regards to Modern Warfare 2 Central Command!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The odd-looking identity lambda by Isla Watson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2009/05/the-odd-looking-identity-lambda/comment-page-1/#comment-917</link>
		<dc:creator>Isla Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 01:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ijw.co.nz/chris/index.php/2009/05/the-odd-looking-identity-lambda/#comment-917</guid>
		<description>What is the latest and most expensive cellphones this year ?:&quot;:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the latest and most expensive cellphones this year ?:&#8221;:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
